A Workaholic Economy Reading Answers with Explanations

Are you an IELTS candidate looking for reading passages? If yes, then read the sample below of a workaholic economy reading answers for reference. In addition, detailed explanations of questions are also provided. You can practice by writing down the complex words given in the passage and analyze how they relate.

The reading section assesses aspirant's language skills with 4-5 types of questions. However, you have to solve all the questions in the 20 minutes approx. Hope all your answers are right if not, do not worry. You can build your skills and knowledge by taking IELTS mock tests provided by Gradding.com.

IELTS Prep Boost

Elevate your preparation with exclusive tools

Unlimited Access Includes

BEST PLAN
99/ 1 Days
Study Material Access
Full-Length Mock Tests
Practice Questions
Video Lectures

Duration Days

IELTS Reading Passage: A Workaholic Economy

Paragraph 1:   FOR THE first century or so of the industrial revolution, increased productivity led to decreases in working hours. Employees who had been putting in 12-hour days, six days a week, found their time on the job shrinking to 10 hours daily, then, finally, to eight hours, five days a week. Only a generation ago social planners worried about what people would do with all this new-found free time. In the US, at least, it seems they need not have bothered.

Paragraph 2:   Although the output per hour of work has more than doubled since 1945, leisure seems reserved largely for the unemployed and underemployed. Those who work full-time spend as much time on the job as they did at the end of World War II. In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year. Bookstores now abound with manuals describing how to manage time and cope with stress.

Paragraph 3:   There are several reasons for lost leisure. Since 1979, companies have responded to improvements in the business climate by having employees work overtime rather than by hiring extra personnel, says economist Juliet B. Schor of Harvard University. Indeed, the current economic recovery has gained a certain amount of notoriety for its “jobless” nature: increased production has been almost entirely decoupled from employment. Some firms are even downsizing as their profits climb. “All things being equal, we”d be better off spreading around the work,’ observes labour economist Ronald G. Ehrenberg of Cornell University.

Paragraph 4:   Yet a host of factors pushes employers to hire fewer workers for more hours and, at the same time, compels workers to spend more time on the job. Most of those incentives involve what Ehrenberg calls the structure of compensation: quirks in the way salaries and benefits are organised that make it more profitable to ask 40 employees to labour an extra hour each than to hire one more worker to do the same 40-hour job.

Paragraph 5:   Professional and managerial employees supply the most obvious lesson along these lines. Once people are on salary, their cost to a firm is the same whether they spend 35 hours a week in the office or 70. Diminishing returns may eventually set in as overworked employees lose efficiency or leave for more arable pastures. But in the short run, the employer’s incentive is clear.

Paragraph 6:   Even hourly employees receive benefits - such as pension contributions and medical insurance - that are not tied to the number of hours they work. Therefore, it is more profitable for employers to work their existing employees harder.

Paragraph 7:   For all that employees complain about long hours, they, too, have reasons not to trade money for leisure. “People who work reduced hours pay a huge penalty in career terms,” Schor maintains. “It”s taken as a negative signal’ about their commitment to the firm.’ Lotte Bailyn of Massachusetts Institute of Technology adds that many corporate managers find it difficult to measure the contribution of their underlings to a firm’s well-being, so they use the number of hours worked as a proxy for output. “Employees know this,” she says, and they adjust their behavior accordingly.

Paragraph 8:   “Although the image of the good worker is the one whose life belongs to the company,” Bailyn says, “it doesn't fit the facts.’ She cites both quantitative and qualitative studies that show increased productivity for part-time workers: they make better use of the time they have, and they are less likely to succumb to fatigue in stressful jobs. Companies that employ more workers for less time also gain from the resulting redundancy, she asserts. “The extra people can cover the contingencies that you know are going to happen, such as when crises take people away from the workplace.’ Positive experiences with reduced hours have begun to change the more-is-better culture at some companies, Schor reports.

Paragraph 9:   Larger firms, in particular, appear to be more willing to experiment with flexible working arrangements...

It may take even more than changes in the financial and cultural structures of employment for workers successfully to trade increased productivity and money for leisure time, Schor contends. She says the U.S. market for goods has become skewed by the assumption of full-time, two-career households. Automobile makers no longer manufacture cheap models, and developers do not build the tiny bungalows that served the first generation of home buyers. Not even the humblest household object is made without a microprocessor. As Schor notes, the situation is a curious inversion of the “appropriate technology” vision that designers have had for developing countries: U.S. goods are appropriate only for high incomes and long hours.

Answer of a Workaholic Economy Reading Passage with Explanation

Questions 1-6

Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage?

1. Today, employees are facing a reduction in working hours.

2. Social planners have been consulted about US employment figures.

3. The economic recovery created more jobs.

4. The economic recovery created more jobs.

5. Bailyn’s research shows that part-time employees work more efficiently.

6. Increased leisure time would benefit two-career households.

Questions 7-8

Choose the appropriate letters A-D and write them in boxes 7-8 on your answer sheet.

7. Bailyn argues that it is better for a company to employ more workers because

a. it is easy to make excess staff redundant.

b. crises occur if you are under-staffed.

c. people are available to substitute for absent staff.

d. they can project a positive image at work.

8. Schor thinks it will be difficult for workers in the US to reduce their working hours because

a. they would not be able to afford cars or homes.

b. employers are offering high incomes for long hours.

c. the future is dependent on technological advances.

d. they do not wish to return to the humble post-war era.

Questions 9-12

The writer mentions a number of factors that have resulted, in employees working longer hours.

Which FOUR of the following factors are mentioned?

List of Factors
A. Books are available to help employees cope with stress.
B. Extra work is offered to existing employees.
C. Increased production has led to joblessness.
D. Benefits and hours spent on the job are not linked.
E. Overworked employees require longer to do their work.
F. Longer hours indicate greater commitment to the firm.
G. Managers estimate staff productivity in terms of hours worked.
H. Employees value a career more than a family. 
Write your answers (A-H) in boxes 9-12 on your answer sheet.
Best Value Guaranteed

Premium IELTS Coaching

at an Affordable Price

Starts From
0123456789
0123456789
0123456789
0123456789
₹8999
Save 50%

Answers of “A Workaholic Economy” Reading Passage with Explanation

Let us see all the solutions with their detailed explanations for A Workaholic Economy Reading Answers. This will give you a brief idea of how to answer the questions in the exam.

Question 1

ANSWER : False
Explanation :In the 3rd sentence of the 1st paragraph where it mentions “found their time on the job shrinking to 10 hours daily, then, finally, to eight hours, five days a week.” That shows working hours are reduced from 10 hours to 5 hours in a day and work for 5 days in a week. So, the answer will be “False”.

Question 2

ANSWER : Not Given
Explanation :There is no such sentence given in the whole passage. So, the answer will be “Not Given”.

Question 3

ANSWER : True
Explanation :In the 3rd sentence of the 2nd paragraph where it mentions “In fact, working hours have increased noticeably since 1970 — perhaps because real wages have stagnated since that year.” It clearly shows that wages have not followed since 1970. So, the answer will be “True”.
unlock now

Unlock All Explanations for Free

Question 4

ANSWER : False
Explanation :In the 3rd sentence of the 3rd paragraph where it is mentioned “Indeed, the current economic recovery has gained a certain amount of notoriety for its “jobless” nature: increased production has been almost entirely decoupled from employment.” This line shows that the economy hasn’t created more jobs but has gained a jobless nature. So, the answer is “False”.

Explore All Mock Tests
Market Prep Boost

IELTS Prep Boost

Unlimited Access Includes

Mock Tests900+ Tests
Practice Material15k+ Practice Questions
Video Lessons65+ Recorded Lectures
Know More

Important Links for IELTS Exam

Quick Links

Start Your IELTS preparation with Expert Trainers to get 8+ Band

Explore IELTS Courses
whatsapp icon

disclaimer:logos and other registered trademarks of universities used on this platform are held by their respective owners. Gradding does not claim ownership or association on them, and their use is purely for informational and illustrative purposes.

Copyrights ©2026 Gradding. All rights reserved.
Gradding Rated 4.3/5 based on 13470Reviews