Frogwatch Reading Answers with Explanation

Every now and then, an IELTS Reading passage drops you straight into a real scientific debate instead of just handing over facts to memorise. The Frogwatch reading answers are a good example of this.

The passage follows a citizen-science project from Western Australia and the disagreement it sparked between the scientist who started it and a colleague who is not quite convinced by its methods. Candidates get ten fairly detailed paragraphs and two question types to work through, so this one rewards careful reading over quick skimming. What usually trips people up is not the vocabulary, it is mixing up which of the two researchers actually said what, since their views run in opposite directions for most of the passage. Let us go through it properly.

Grab FREE IELTS Mock Test

Claim this exclusive limited time offer!

  • Replica of real IELTS Test in exact format
  • Detailed Report with Expert Feedback
  • Get your scores improved with experts
Banner Girlpercentagesign
Best Value Guaranteed

Premium IELTS Coaching

at an Affordable Price

Starts From
0123456789
,
0123456789
0123456789
0123456789
8999
Save 50%

Answers to Frogwatch Reading Passage with Explanation

Now that you have had a go at the passage yourself, let us look at your results to see how well you performed on it. The correct answers to Frogwatch reading test will be provided below, explained in detail step by step.

Question 1

ANSWER : No
Explanation :The first paragraph states that the approach taken by Aplin was one that involved untrained members of the public being educated on frog habitat and making observations, without any reference to any need for scientific knowledge on the part of the observer. The correct response to this is thus "No."

Question 2

ANSWER : Not Given
Explanation :As explained in paragraph 1, the group Frogwatch started in Western Australia when Aplin initiated it, but nowhere in the text does it say where the members hail from. The appropriate response to this question is therefore Not Given.

Question 3

ANSWER : No
Explanation :It becomes quite evident from Paragraph 2 that the connection between the fungus and frog deaths is only an assumption; the research is incomplete, and the origin of the species is an assumption by the scientists. As none of these can be considered to be evidence, the answer is No.
unlock now

Unlock All Explanations for Free

Question 4

ANSWER : No
Explanation :As per Paragraph 3, there are more than 2,000 frogs that have been studied but out of which, around half have been sourced from Frogwatch members and the other half had been stored in the museum already. Thus, as Frogwatch supplied around 1,000 frogs, the answer to this question is No.

Explore All Mock Tests
Market Prep Boost

IELTS Prep Boost

Unlimited Access Includes

Mock Tests900+ Tests
Practice Material15k+ Practice Questions
Video Lessons65+ Recorded Lectures
Know More

Important Links for IELTS Exam

Quick Links

whatsapp icon

disclaimer:logos and other registered trademarks of universities used on this platform are held by their respective owners. Gradding does not claim ownership or association on them, and their use is purely for informational and illustrative purposes.

Copyrights ©2026 Gradding. All rights reserved.
Gradding Rated 4.3/5 based on 13434Reviews